North American essayist Michael Hutter says that violence occurs when art does not name its own reality. He is right, because art exists not only because of the reciprocal enjoyment of creation and contemplation, but because it is urgently necessary to look at oneself, to measure oneself, to recognize oneself in the objective distance, and also in the subjective and collective pain to be able to accomplish art at the same time with pleasure and admiration. Movies123 offers best and trending movies.
The Right Game
If this dialectical game does not take place in a society, doubts arise, confusion, darkness, and ignorance occur. And then everything can happen. Because it is easily possible that an entire society does not understand itself, is dragged to the abyss, it is easily possible that an individual does not mind to be nothing, to do nothing or to fight for something when it is not clear about its own identity. Borders are blurring, ethics has no viable reference points, and violence seems the most acceptable alternative. A society that does not look at itself or starts it too late dilutes its identification process, loses its identity. It confuses, and then everything is conceivable, because if we do not know who we are, we will accept corruption as a principle of living together, as a natural modus vivendi. Cynicism breaks through as part of the process of destroying identification, and as the philosopher suggests, the culture of any thing leads to the arbitrary solitary society. That is, to society without legality.
The society and Us
If we want to ask ourselves about the situation of our society, we must also consider the role of art, the behavior of intellectuals and artists. That means we have to look at the supporting mirrors of our society created by those. But the mirrors too often show us the face of other societies in the work of our own artists, and seldom the countenance of our own.
A strange carelessness to stifle initiatives in our complex and colorful reality
Our ethnic diversity intimidates us; many prefer to ignore the multicolored presence of the “other” as a consumptive substance. Quite a few intellectuals prefer to deepen oneself in the scientific study of the distance and thereby strive for a false and hypocritical universality. The politicians favor the “arrangement” of moderating measures against the historical fears of the majorities cast out of society, and they refrain from tackling integration as a real and possible alternative. For sure, this path has been the fastest for centuries, and so has neutralized the enormous impetus in which the dark skinned played the lead role. It is to be feared that we will reach the limit. Soon enough, it will no longer be enough to extract from the tradition models that, though correct and commendable, are slowing the will to change and actually participate in the mechanisms of political power. It is urgent to better understand society, to generate a more democratic will in the direction of those masses, to raise awareness of issues such as racial discrimination, which is currently not the subject of even a serious scientific study, but capable of generating endless violence. One must overcome the lordly inertia of accepting the land as it is, recognizing the collective rights, and thus creating a true nation that enjoys its diversity.